Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
9>9 Personal answerEl asesinato debería estar prohibido en todos los supuestos. |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
9>9 Personal answerNo. De hecho, no llamaría "matrimonio" a una unión de esta índole. Sí que permitiría pactos económicos en cuestiones de herencias y dinerarias. |
Healthcare › Healthcare Privatization
9>9 Personal answerAumentarlo para las cosas de vida o muerte, dejarlo como está en intervenciones corrientes y dejar de subvencionar con dinero público prácticas médicas poco éticas. |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Elections › Lifetime Salaries for Politicians
9>9 Personal answerNo, but they should be reduced |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
9>9 Personal answerSí, pero siempre que el delito muy grave. En otros casos, no. |
Foreign Policy › European Union
9>9 Personal answerNo, pero reducir bastante las intromisiones comunitarias que traten de "homogeneizar" con despotismo a los países. Limitarse a evitar guerras entre las naciones que la integran la Unión Europea, que fue el motivo principal por el que se creó la; y mantener algunos acuerdos económicos. |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
9>9 Personal answerYes, but after they have finished serving their sentence |
Education › University Tuition
9>9 Personal answerNo, but tuition costs are currently too expensive |
Domestic Policy › Monarchy
9>9 Personal answerMonarquía. La dejaría como está hoy, pero con derecho de veto en cuestiones muy elementales y de excepción. Un sistema a medio camino entre el de España y el de Liechtenstein. |
the Economy › Taxes
9>9 Personal answerNo, but lower taxes for the poor |
Social › Animal Rights
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Catalonia Independence
9>9 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Government Spending
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Science › Mandatory Vaccinations
9>9 Personal answerSí en caso de enfermedades graves. No en otros de fuerza menor. |
Crime › Judicial Investigations
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Transportation › Public Transportation
9>9 Personal answerNo, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
9>9 Personal answerSí, pero de tres meses y que no sea estrictamente formación militar, sino centrada en espabilar a la juventud. |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
9>9 Personal answerNo, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries |
Healthcare › Contraception
9>9 Personal answerEl mismo acceso y sin promocionarlos. Prohibiría los abortivos. |
Science › Nuclear Energy
9>9 Personal answerYes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
9>9 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Citizenship Test
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Flag Burning
9>9 Personal answerSí que lo prohibiría, pero para evitar los ultrajes con repercusión pública. Si fuese poli, haría la vista gorda o pondría una multita leve a un grupo de tontainas que lo hiciesen con un calimocho en la mano y un petilla en la oreja. |
National Security › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answerNo, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
9>9 Personal answerMantenerlo como está y sin involucrarnos en guerras innecesarias. |
Crime › Prison Overcrowding
9>9 Personal answerYes, but place them under house arrest using an electronic bracelet |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › World Health Organization
9>9 Personal answerNo, fund national and local programs instead |
Crime › Demilitarize the Police
9>9 Personal answerYes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment |
the Environment › Canary Island Oil Exploration
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.