Try the political quiz

0 Reply

 @9DH9M4Tfrom North Carolina answered…8mos8MO

Cut all government programs that are deemed not needed and change the healthcare system.

 @9CZHQ9Ranswered…9mos9MO

Focus on ending tax evasion and reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials

 @9CSKTXHanswered…9mos9MO

 @984GD42answered…1yr1Y

There will always be a debts, educating society is a must so we can all become aware of what we should spend and shouldn’t for the better of civilisation

 @964FVVWanswered…2yrs2Y

Don't pay the debt, we mainly owe money to Banks that created the money from thin air

 @8Z5WKMVanswered…2yrs2Y

Si, en ciertos aspectos como la financiación al cine o fútbol. También realizar una bajada general de impuestos y reducir el número de ayuntamientos, políticos, concejales y alcaldes.

 @8VH4SQRanswered…3yrs3Y

Reduce the money spent in governmental institutions6, getting rid of the useless

 @8TPXLMXanswered…3yrs3Y

Establecer sistemas mixtos entre lo público y lo privado, así como reducir algunas tasas.

 @8TPRPLVanswered…3yrs3Y

Quizás debería bajar los impuestos o implantar sistemas mixtos (publico-privado)

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Should high school students have a say in how governments prioritize spending and debt reduction, given that these decisions will impact their future?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

If the government reduces funding to public arts and cultural programs to shrink national debt, how do you think that would affect our country's cultural landscape?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How could cuts to public spending in areas like scientific research and public health impact our society's ability to deal with future crises and pandemics?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

What might be the long-term consequences for our generation if the government prioritizes debt reduction over investments in sustainability and the environment?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Would you be willing to pay higher taxes in the future if it meant the government wouldn't have to make deep cuts to important programs now?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How do you think cutting public spending to reduce debt could affect job opportunities for people who are about to enter the workforce, like many high school students?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Can you recall a time when a government-funded service helped you out, and how would you feel if it was no longer available due to budget cuts?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Imagine the government had to cut spending on roads and infrastructure to reduce debt; how might that affect your daily life and community?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

If you had to choose, what would you consider more important for your future: reducing national debt or maintaining funding for education and healthcare?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How would you feel if a public program that you or your family benefits from was cut to reduce national debt?

 @93VVP97 from New York answered…2yrs2Y

reduce politicians benefits, reduce military spending, end tax evasion, and increase taxes on multinational corporations

 @93MBYLY from Utah answered…2yrs2Y

 @924MYCK from GU answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, if there is unnecessary or wasteful spending on certain areas, just ensure that the borrowed money used in public spending is spent wisely. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt.

 @mkimball from Massachusetts answered…2yrs2Y

 @92ZYZRW from Missouri answered…2yrs2Y

No reduce military spending and tax evasion or tax loopholes for the wealthy

 @9334YP3answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, the government should have little or no money to spend in the first place.

 @92YHQCV from California answered…2yrs2Y

No, instead we should A. reduce military spending, B. focus on ending tax evasion, and C. increase taxes on the wealthy

 @8Z6PZKW from Louisiana answered…2yrs2Y

  @st60645078 from Ohio answered…2yrs2Y

No, defund the military, increase taxes on the wealthy, and increase taxes on multinational corporations.

 @8YWHYGD from Ohio answered…2yrs2Y

No, defund the military, increase taxes on the wealthy, and increase taxes on large multinational corporations.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, if there is unnecessary or wasteful spending on certain areas, just ensure that the borrowed money/funds used in public spending is used more efficiently and appropriately. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt.

 @5BMX4XTanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, Issue bonds, reduce federal oversite agencies that compete with state and local government, reduce corporate loopholes or institute a flat tax.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only when there is some unnecessary/wasteful spending on certain areas, just ensure that the borrowed money/funds used in public spending are used more efficiently and appropriately. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only if there is unnecessary or wasteful spending on certain areas, just ensure that the borrowed money/funds used in public spending is used more efficiently and appropriately. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only if there is unnecessary or wasteful spending on certain areas, just ensure that the borrowed money/funds used in public spending is adjusted and used more efficiently and appropriately. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only if there is wasteful spending that overspend on certain areas, just ensure that the borrowed money/funds used in public spending is adjusted and used more efficiently and appropriately. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt.

 @rightandbased from Iowa answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and increase taxes on large multinational corporations and other companies who receive government contracts and assistance.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only if they overspend much and/or when there is some unnecessary spending in public funds. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only if they overspend much/when there is some unnecessary spending in public funds. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt. Also, reduce taxes on middle and low-income citizens and use the money to fund any new programs.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, the government must curtail excess spending only if they overspend much, or when there is some unnecessary waste in public funds. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt. Also, lower taxes for low and middle-income individuals while getting rid of all tax loopholes.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, the government must curtail excess spending, but only if there is some unnecessary expenses in public funds. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt. Also, lower taxes for low and middle-income individuals while we get rid of loopholes.

 @8Y2TFS5 from Florida answered…2yrs2Y

No, cut waste and reform the tax code so the rich cannot get around paying taxes.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, the government must curtail excess spending instead of wasting it on unnecessary expenses. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt. Also, lower taxes for low and middle-income individuals while we get rid of loopholes.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, the government must curtail excess spending instead of wasting it on unnecessary expenses in public funds. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt. Also, lower taxes for low and middle-income individuals while we get rid of loopholes.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...