@9KFKWFS2mos2MO
It heavely depends on the cause. Medical research should be allowed as long as it isn't for banal purposes.
@9G7VF836mos6MO
If it hurts them then then maybe not However I think you should test things on volunteers I don’t support testing on animals but again I really need to go into depth to know enough to have my opinion
@9CWQ7LD9mos9MO
Debería crearse una ética lo más justa posible para los animales y que no afecte al desarrollo
@9CTV3YW9mos9MO
Only in critical situations
@9CMFPRT10mos10MO
@9C8TBFH11mos11MO
Yes, but only at the last stages of testing and not for cosmetics
@9C7RZ6X11mos11MO
Yes, as long as it is vital to helping humans and not just for aethetic of cost reasons
@984GD421yr1Y
As longer it’s safe and its been proven no to harm the animal or person. There should be testing parameters to a more or less safe level
@8S23BN63yrs3Y
Test on volunteers and convicted felons
@8NQL8CR3yrs3Y
Just for extreme necessary things
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@842VWLK2yrs2Y
yes, but only if one, it has a low risk of greatly harming the animal, and two, the medical device/vaccine will save millions of lives, wipe out a virus, and/or is groundbreaking. ban cosmetic testing on animals altogether.
@7VRTYM52yrs2Y
Yes, but only less important animals.
@92JXK3J2yrs2Y
Not for cosmetics, and ensure that the animals are treated ethically.
@93GLTS32yrs2Y
Yes, unless the animals go through pain.
@93FNHSZ2yrs2Y
Yes as long as it’s not cruel and inhumane
@LiamHal786386402yrs2Y
Yes and allow human testing
@9334YP32yrs2Y
Yes, but only after testing on themselves first.
@932GCCP2yrs2Y
Yes, but only things like rats and stuff
@92XHX9V2yrs2Y
as long as they are not harmed
@92W2JVT2yrs2Y
No, and it should have a consequence (jail)
@92T53D92yrs2Y
Yes, but strictly rodents
@92PFG4M2yrs2Y
Its a bad thing to not hurt animals
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, but only on mice or rodent animal species and not for cosmetics
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, but not for cosmetics and only on mice or rodent animal species
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, but not for cosmetics and only on mice or various rodent types of animal species
@8ZY28ML2yrs2Y
yes only for rats though
@8ZY2C692yrs2Y
Only if its a pointless animal.
@8M258QP2yrs2Y
No- prisoners should elect to be able to par take in this testing rather than animals if they are on death row- joining this program would halt death row.
@8ZLFQSG2yrs2Y
Yes, but not if it’ll harm the animal
@8ZMSVTB2yrs2Y
Yes, but only on non-intelligent animals
@5BMX4XT2yrs2Y
Yes for safety of drugs, caccines & medical devices. Not for cosmetics nor cosmetic surgeries.
@8ZLFQJW2yrs2Y
As long as it’s not inhumane
@8ZMD43W2yrs2Y
@8ZGG8TM2yrs2Y
As long as it stays to maybe just rats and overpopulated rodents
@8ZGPKM92yrs2Y
no because we need animals or the natural and if they get killed then what are we gonna do and animals have completely different dna so it would not help us at all
@85QWNPG2yrs2Y
Yes, with riggorous oversight to maintain fair treatment for the animals in these situations.
@7NHW7HN2yrs2Y
Yes, but not for the cosmetics, and not excessively
@8Y6XX9F2yrs2Y
Yes, as long as animals aren't cruelly treated.
@8VHBC3L2yrs2Y
No, all life is precious
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...