Should the government fund the World Health Organization?

How accountable do you think global health organizations should be to the public or to the countries that fund them?

If you could decide what health problem the WHO focused on next, what issue would you choose and why?

How would you balance the role of private donations versus government funding in global health organizations like the WHO?

Do you think more attention should be given to diseases in wealthier countries or those that affect mainly developing nations?

In what ways could cutting funding to global health organizations, like the WHO, impact future outbreaks of illnesses like COVID-19?

How important do you believe it is for countries to work together to fight global pandemics, rather than each nation acting alone?

What do you think sounds more valuable—spending money on global health initiatives or addressing local health problems first?

Should wealthy nations contribute more to global health efforts to support poorer countries, or should every country be responsible for their own health system?

How do you think global health organizations, like the WHO, can affect your personal life and health choices?

I think we shouldn’t fund both the world health organization and national and local programs as well

Fund the WHO, but prioritize local programs

Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute unless there's a Pandemic, then we'll increase the amount

No, the government should declare anyone employed by the WHO outlaws and issue warrants for their arrest and bounties for their capture, dead or alive. In addition, the government should sanction all member countries.

Yes, but only in an amount sufficient to acquire "soft power". Most of our policy making should reside at the state and local levels.

Yes, decrease military spending and use it on WHO and healthcare

Yes but only with help from the rest the world and it should not be a big amount

Yes, as long as it's effective

No, shift funding to establish an American Health Organization with a strict area of influence only covering the American contienent.

should cover most of it with insurance

Yes, but only relative to the current amount needed to combat illness.

Yes, relative to the amount that that the EU contributes

The WHO should be funded by all governments across the globe

All Government financials need a rehaul and you should a get better Treasury and switch to a blockchain system I created; you need me

they should fund whatever needs to be funded in their own country if only it's to make healthcare and medicine free for people living in america.

No, not until it cuts ties with China

No, fund Black-owned businesses instead.

I agree and disagree with this.

no they need to pay more attention to our country than others.

No, fund national and local programs instead, and leave the United Nations

No, and we should withdraw from the WHO

it is fine how it is

I honestly have no idea

Yes, but only on the condition that we demand and enforce reform, and decouple the organization from undesirable influence from foreign adversaries.

No, they did not hold China accountable for Covid 19

Yes, in addition to funding national and local programs

The government should pull out, if not abolish, the World Health Organization

No, we should share that responsibility with other nations in the United Nations. The amount should be proportionate to the GDP/economy of each nation

No, it's ineffective and we should leave it.

No, and leave the WHO.

No, there are too many existing conflicts of interest.

Yes. but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute, also their should be an international investigation on WHO and China to find out if their was a cover up.

do a study on the effectiveness and also the necessary funding

Drastically reduce or end funding for as long as non-communist countries continue to have diplomatic relations with China (PRC) (instead of Taiwan (ROC) and recognize it's government as the sole legitimate government government of all China, and allowing people with PRC passports or passports with PRC visas and stamp, to enter the borders of non-communist countries

Reduce or end funding for as long as non-communist countries continue to have diplomatic relations with China (PRC) (instead of Taiwan (ROC) and recognize it's government as the sole legitimate government government of all China, and allowing people with PRC passports or passports with PRC visas and stamp, to enter the borders of non-communist countries

Yes, and work to increase every nation's contributions.

i need to learn more about this topic

I would need more information to answer this question

I don't much about this matter

only relative to the amount that other countries contribute