Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry. Critics argue that such a policy might inadvertently promote discrimination by broadly categorizing individuals based on their nation of origin rather than specific, credible threat intelligence. It may strain diplomatic relations with the affected countries and potentially harm the perception of the nation enacting the ban, being seen as hostile or prejudiced towards certain international communities. Additionally, genuine refugees fleeing terrorism or persecution in their home countries might be unjustly denied safe haven.
69% Yes |
31% No |
69% Yes |
31% No |
See how support for each position on “High Risk Immigrant Ban” has changed over time for 6.5k Spain voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “High Risk Immigrant Ban” has changed over time for 6.5k Spain voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Spain users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9HQ25XW4mos4MO
The Same Rigorous screening process should be applied no matter the country of origin. As for Refugees Spain should focus on aiding the UNHCR in their screening process.
Explore other topics that are important to Spain voters.