Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry. Critics argue that such a policy might inadvertently promote discrimination by broadly categorizing individuals based on their nation of origin rather than specific, credible threat intelligence. It may strain diplomatic relations with the affected countries and potentially harm the perception of the nation enacting the ban, being seen as hostile or prejudiced towards certain international communities. Additionally, genuine refugees fleeing terrorism or persecution in their home countries might be unjustly denied safe haven.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Voting for candidate
Response rates from 228 Environmentalism voters.
34% Yes |
66% No |
34% Yes |
66% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 228 Environmentalism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 228 Environmentalism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Environmentalism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9TNDP6C2mos2MO
Yes, dangerous people should be searched, refugees are allowed if there are no threats to our country and a safe space should be provided for them and maybe a fake id so they arent endangered. If they arent terrorists they should be allowed in.
@9HQ25XW11mos11MO
The Same Rigorous screening process should be applied no matter the country of origin. As for Refugees Spain should focus on aiding the UNHCR in their screening process.