@ISIDEWITHQuestionselections8yrs ago

Should a politician, who has been formerly convicted of a crime, be allowed to run for office?

The U.S. constitution does not prevent convicted felons from holding the office of the President or a seat in the Senate or House of Representatives. States may prevent convicted felons candidates from holding statewide and local offices.

+
Expand
+ Settings

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 718k Spain voters.

21%
Yes
79%
No
8%
Yes
73%
No
10%
Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime
6%
No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime
3%
Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence
1%
Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 718k Spain voters.

Chart
Line chart with 8 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying values. Range: to .
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 718k Spain voters.

Chart
Line chart with 9 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying values. Range: to .
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Spain voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9DH9M4Tfrom North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

If the crime is a felony then no.

 @8VFV5S7answered…4yrs4Y

No, disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime until proven innocent.

 @9C7RZ6Xanswered…2yrs2Y

It depends on the crime (stealing a chocolate bar at 7 years of age is not the same as stealing billions of euros)

 @9978VLHanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes as long as they have served the sentences and been completely honest about it

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3mos3MO

Defense Bill Blocks Transgender Care To Minors

The Senate on Wednesday gave final approval to a defense policy bill directing $895 billion toward the Pentagon and other military activities, moving over the objections of some Democrats who opposed a provision added late in the negotiations that would deny coverage for transgender health procedures for minors.The 85-to-14 vote, coming a week after a divided House passed the same measure, cleared the bill for President Biden’s signature.Most Republicans and many Democrats supported the measure, which provides a 14.5 percent pay raise to junior enlisted service members and a 4.5 percent pay raise for all other service members. It also expands access to meal assistance, housing and child care programs that benefit those in uniform.But several Democrats withheld their backing in protest of a provision preventing TRICARE, the military’s health care plan for service members, from covering “medical interventions for the treatment of gender dysphoria that could result in sterilization” for children under 18.The language, which would affect the gender-transitioning children of service members, was recently added to the measure at the insistence of Speaker Mike Johnson, Republican of Louisiana, who refused to bring a defense bill to the House floor without it, according to aides familiar with the negotiations.Twenty-one Democrats, led by Senator Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, proposed an amendment to strip the provision from the bill, but the matter was never brought to a vote. Several of them took to the floor on Tuesday to lodge their objections.“It’s flat-out wrong to put this provision in this bill and take away a service member’s freedom to make that decision for their families,” Ms. Baldwin said, estimating that the provision could negatively affect as many as 6,000 to 7,000 military families.

▲  2019 replies5 agree1 disagree6