Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 安乐死
RF>RF Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
社会 › LGBT收养权
RF>RF Personal answer是,只要他们通过与异性夫妇同样的背景检查。 |
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
RF>RF Personal answerLess, and there should be no privatization of the healthcare industry |
总统大选 › Lifetime Salaries for Politicians
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 帝制
RF>RF Personal answer共和党人 |
社会 › Gender Transition
RF>RF Personal answerYes, but only for non-surgical treatments such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy |
社会 › 动物权益
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
经济 › VAT Rates
RF>RF Personal answer减少 |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
RF>RF Personal answer是的,而且他们在任的每一年要求一个公开审计 |
经济 › Four-day Workweek
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
社会 › Hate Speech
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › Political Party Subsidies
RF>RF Personal answerYes, and funding should be proportional to the amount of votes they receive |
经济 › 国内工作
RF>RF Personal answerYes, an initial 5 year tax break and then gradually enter into regular taxation without a retroactive collection, allowing businesses the time to grow and become profitable. |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 任期限制
RF>RF Personal answer应该,任期限制将提高绩效和防止腐败 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
RF>RF Personal answer不,但是我们应该禁止从“高危”国家移民。 |
外交政策 › United States of Europe
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
医保 › 避孕
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 技术移民
RF>RF Personal answer增加,我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
外交政策 › 对朝鲜的军事打击
RF>RF Personal answer不应该,我们应让中国解决此问题 |
环境 › Animal Testing
RF>RF Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
RF>RF Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
移民 › 公民考试
RF>RF Personal answer不,就连大多数公民都无法通过公民资格测试 |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 乌克兰
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 外国选举
RF>RF Personal answerNo, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
移民 › 双重国籍
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › European Commission
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
RF>RF Personal answerNo, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead |
外交政策 › EU Army
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Post Brexit UK
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Israel Boycott
RF>RF Personal answer不应该,这是对言论自由的侵犯 |
经济 › State Ownership
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
RF>RF Personal answerNo, because every human being needs some sort of shelter and public spaces do not provide that, a hybrid project between the city and the homeless could be the answer to this issue. |
医保 › Vaccine Passports
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
移民 › Migrant Children
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
医保 › 安全港
RF>RF Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
外交政策 › Central EU Agency
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
医保 › World Health Organization
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
RF>RF Personal answerYes, but only if local citizens can vote on the amount of incentives to offer |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
RF>RF Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
外交政策 › European Union Countries
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Backstop
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
经济 › Cryptocurrency
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
经济 › 跨大西洋贸易和投资伙伴
RF>RF Personal answerYes, but more priority should be given to food safety and environmental protection |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Decentralized Finance
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
RF>RF Personal answer不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
外交政策 › Hong Kong Fugitive Extradition
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 27 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 21 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.