Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
总统大选 › Lifetime Salaries for Politicians
9>9 Personal answerNo, as long as they do not work for a private company |
国内政策 › 帝制
9>9 Personal answer共和党人 |
社会 › 动物权益
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
总统大选 › Political Party Subsidies
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 移民公民身份
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only after 5 years of residence, employment, and no criminal record |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
9>9 Personal answer不,但是我们应该禁止从“高危”国家移民。 |
外交政策 › United States of Europe
9>9 Personal answer不 |
医保 › 避孕
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
9>9 Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
环境 › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answer是的,但是只有在他们在此国家生活5年后 |
总统大选 › Mental competency testing
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
9>9 Personal answerNo, I think businesses should require vaccination but not by government mandate |
医保 › Medical Consensus
9>9 Personal answerNo, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient |
移民 › 双重国籍
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answer不 |
环境 › Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answer不 |
移民 › Migrant Children
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
医保 › World Health Organization
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
9>9 Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
9>9 Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
9>9 Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
罪行 › Private Prisons
9>9 Personal answerYes, but they should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption |
环境 › EV Subsidies
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.