Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
9>9 Personal answerProhibido privatizar ahí habría que invertir más dinero |
教育 › 大学学费
9>9 Personal answerSí, hay gente que tiene talento pero no dinero para poder formase |
国内政策 › 帝制
9>9 Personal answer共和党人 |
经济 › 税
9>9 Personal answerDesde el gobierno se debería quitar el sueldo vitalicio a los políticos que no ejerzan, cuando la gente que no es política deja de trabajar en un sitio no sigue cobrando de ese sitio ¿Porqué ellos sí? Además se debería destinar ese dinero a obra social y ayudar a que la gente no viva en la calle |
社会 › 动物权益
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › 司法调查
9>9 Personal answerLos jueces deberían ser independientes, deberían separarse los jueces que hacen investigaciones políticas de los que no las hacen, tendrían que crear una especialización para que los jueces se preparasen para eso. |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
9>9 Personal answer不,但是我们应该禁止从“高危”国家移民。 |
医保 › 避孕
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answer是的,但是他们应该只被允许在当地选举中投票 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answerNo, enviarlos al país donde es sospechoso y que lo juzguen allí |
外交政策 › 军费支出
9>9 Personal answerSí el dinero invertido para gasto militar va destinado a tal uso, me aparece correcto en caso contrario habría que investigar quien se queda en dinero y reutilizar ese dinero en su destino. |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
9>9 Personal answerConsiderando que están en la cárcel deberían hacer obra social y demostrar arrepentimiento y que han cambiado para poder salir de allí, además se le tendrían que hacer evaluación psicológica |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answer不 |
医保 › 安全港
9>9 Personal answerDeberían legalizar la marihuana con prescripción médica igual que es legal el CBD, y aumentar el número de centros de rehabilitación |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
9>9 Personal answerEn principio no, solo en caso de extrema necesidad. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.