Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 死刑
8>8 Personal answerPersonne ne peut se donner le droit de déclarer cette sentance car tout le monde est égal au près de la loi. Ainsi, personne ne doit attenter à la vie d'autrui, même pas un juge, ni le representant d'une autorité nationale suprême, qui reste humain et donc égal. |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete |
总统大选 › Political Party Subsidies
8>8 Personal answerYes, but there should be more restrictions and transparency on how they spend the money |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
8>8 Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
8>8 Personal answer不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品 |
环境 › Animal Testing
8>8 Personal answerOui, mais ça doit être réglementé et limité. Il faut tout de même les protéger un minimum et prédire les resultats. Les animaux doivent passer avant les humains dans la chronologie de test d'un vaccin par exemple, mais si l'on sait que ce vaccin aura des effets nuisibles, ´ça doit être interdit. |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
8>8 Personal answer是的,但是只有在此国家生活10年后 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
8>8 Personal answerNo, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead |
外交政策 › EU Army
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
医保 › 大麻
8>8 Personal answerOui, ceci mettrait fin à beaucoup de mafias, à des trafics illégaux qui se font dans de mauvaises conditions. |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
8>8 Personal answer不应该,但是我们应该增加在为犯人提供教育和技能培训服务方面的资金 |
移民 › Migrant Children
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
医保 › 安全港
8>8 Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
8>8 Personal answer不 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
8>8 Personal answerNo, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
8>8 Personal answerYes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment |
罪行 › Private Prisons
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.