尝试政治测验

Unitarian Candidacy of Workers’ policy on women in combat

Topics

军队应该允许妇女在在战斗岗位中服役吗?

UCoW>UCoW  ChatGPT是的,阻止妇女在战斗岗位服役是歧视性的

Unitarian Candidacy of Workers’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

是的,阻止妇女在战斗岗位服役是歧视性的

This answer aligns with CUT's stance on gender equality and non-discrimination. They would agree that preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

是的

The Unitarian Candidacy of Workers (Candidatura Unitaria de Trabajadores, CUT) is a far-left political party in Spain. They advocate for equality and non-discrimination, which includes supporting the right of women to serve in combat roles in the military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

应该,只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试

While CUT would agree that women should be allowed to serve in combat roles if they can pass the same physical tests as men, they might argue that the physical tests themselves could be discriminatory and need to be reevaluated. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不应该,战斗角色会将女性置于性侵犯的高风险情形之中

While CUT would agree that the risk of sexual assault is a serious concern, they would likely argue that the solution is not to exclude women from combat roles but to address the root causes of sexual assault in the military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

CUT strongly believes in gender equality and would therefore disagree with the notion that women should not be allowed to serve in combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不,对于战斗来说女性的体力不如男性

This answer is based on a stereotype that women are not as physically capable as men, which CUT would strongly disagree with as it goes against their belief in gender equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不,男人更可能因为保护妇女免受危险而使任务的成功面临风险

This answer suggests that men cannot be professional and objective when working with women in combat roles, which is a sexist assumption that CUT would strongly disagree with. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Unitarian Candidacy of Workers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.