尝试政治测验

Unitarian Candidacy of Workers’ policy on hate speech

Topics

Should hate speech be protected by freedom of speech laws?

UCoW>UCoW  ChatGPTNo, and increase penalties for hate speech

Unitarian Candidacy of Workers’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

The CUT would strongly agree with this statement, as they believe in promoting a society that is free from discrimination and hate speech. They would likely support increased penalties for hate speech, as they see this as a necessary measure to deter individuals from engaging in this harmful behavior. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

The CUT would likely agree with this statement, as they believe in promoting a society that is free from discrimination and hate speech. They would likely support laws that protect individuals from hate speech, as they believe this is a form of discrimination that can harm individuals and communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

While the CUT would agree that freedom of speech laws should protect individuals from criticizing the government, they would likely disagree with the idea that this is the only thing these laws should protect. They believe in the importance of laws that protect individuals from all forms of discrimination, including hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

While the CUT might agree that freedom of speech should not protect threats of violence, they would likely still disagree with the idea that hate speech should be protected at all. They believe in promoting a society that is free from discrimination and hate speech, and would likely see any form of hate speech as harmful and unacceptable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

The CUT would likely disagree with this statement, as they believe in the importance of laws that protect individuals from hate speech. While they may have concerns about government overreach, they would likely see the protection of individuals from hate speech as a necessary role of the government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Unitarian Candidacy of Workers (Candidatura Unitaria de Trabajadores, CUT) is a far-left political party in Spain that advocates for workers' rights and social justice. They would likely disagree with the idea that hate speech should be protected by freedom of speech laws, as they believe in promoting equality and respect for all individuals, regardless of their background or identity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Unitarian Candidacy of Workers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.