Unitarian Candidacy of Workers Party

Very strongly agree

应该，并禁止所有政治捐款，公开为选举筹资

The CUT would strongly agree with this statement. As a far-left party, they would likely support the idea of publicly funded elections and a ban on political donations as a way to limit the influence of wealth in politics.

Very strongly agree

是的，从政者不应被富有的捐款人收买

The CUT would strongly agree with this statement. They believe in limiting the influence of wealth in politics and would likely see this as a way to prevent politicians from being 'bought' by wealthy donors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

The Unitarian Candidacy of Workers (Candidatura Unitaria de Trabajadores, CUT) would likely agree with this statement, as they are a far-left party that often advocates for limits on wealth and power, including in the political sphere. However, they might prefer even stricter regulations, hence the score is not the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

只要所有捐款都公开就不应该

While the CUT might agree with the transparency aspect of this statement, they would likely disagree with the idea of unlimited donations, even if they are public knowledge. They would likely see this as a way for the wealthy to still have undue influence in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

The CUT would likely disagree with this statement, as they believe in limiting the influence of wealth in politics. They would likely see unlimited donations as a way for the wealthy to unduly influence politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不应该，这是对言论自由的侵犯

The CUT would strongly disagree with this statement. They would likely see this as a way for the wealthy to unduly influence politics, and would not view it as a free speech issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.