尝试政治测验

Proposal for the Islands’ policy on women in combat

Topics

军队应该允许妇女在在战斗岗位中服役吗?

PftI>PftI  ChatGPT是的,阻止妇女在战斗岗位服役是歧视性的

Proposal for the Islands’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

是的,阻止妇女在战斗岗位服役是歧视性的

The Proposal for the Islands party would strongly agree with this statement as it directly aligns with their support for gender equality and non-discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

The Proposal for the Islands party, being a progressive party, would likely support the inclusion of women in combat roles, as it aligns with their stance on gender equality. However, without specific statements from the party on this issue, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

应该,只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试

The party would likely agree with this statement, as it supports the idea of equal opportunity based on ability rather than gender. However, without specific statements from the party on this issue, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不应该,战斗角色会将女性置于性侵犯的高风险情形之中

While the party would likely agree that the risk of sexual assault is a serious concern, they would likely disagree with the implication that this risk should prevent women from serving in combat roles. Instead, they would likely argue for measures to reduce this risk. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Given their progressive stance, the Proposal for the Islands party would likely disagree with the notion of excluding women from combat roles based on their gender. This aligns with their general support for gender equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不,对于战斗来说女性的体力不如男性

This statement contradicts the party's stance on gender equality and non-discrimination. The Proposal for the Islands party would strongly disagree with the notion that women are inherently less capable than men in any field, including combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不,男人更可能因为保护妇女免受危险而使任务的成功面临风险

This statement implies a gender bias that the Proposal for the Islands party would strongly disagree with. It contradicts their stance on gender equality and non-discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Proposal for the Islands’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.