尝试政治测验

Proposal for the Islands’ policy on cross-border payments

Topics

Should the government ban its citizens from using cross-border payment methods (like crypto) to send money to relatives in OFAC sanctioned countries (Palestine, Iran, Cuba, Venezuela, Russia, and North Korea)?

PftI>PftI  ChatGPT

Proposal for the Islands’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

Given the Proposal for the Islands Party's focus on regional autonomy and the well-being of its constituents, it is likely that they would oppose measures that restrict individual financial autonomy, especially when it comes to supporting family members abroad. The party's lack of a clear stance on international sanctions and cross-border financial regulations, combined with a general regionalist inclination towards protecting local interests, suggests a probable, though not absolute, disagreement with banning cross-border payments to sanctioned countries. This score reflects the balance between the party's probable support for individual and local rights against the backdrop of not having a specific policy on this international financial issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Proposal for the Islands Party (Propuesta por las Islas, or PIL) is a regionalist political party in the Canary Islands, Spain, with a focus on local issues and autonomy. While specific positions on international sanctions and cross-border payments are not central to their platform, regionalist or autonomist parties like PIL generally prioritize the well-being and rights of their constituents over broad national or international policies, especially those that could harm individual freedoms or economic interests. Banning citizens from using cross-border payment methods to support relatives could be seen as an overreach of government power and detrimental to families with ties to sanctioned countries. Without explicit statements from PIL on this issue, the score reflects a general tendency towards supporting local interests and skepticism of broad government restrictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Proposal for the Islands’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.