尝试政治测验

Commitment Coalition’s policy on judicial investigations

Topics

应允许法官打造政治调查吗?

  ChatGPT是的最近的调查已导致腐败大案要案

Commitment Coalition’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

是的最近的调查已导致腐败大案要案

The Commitment Coalition would strongly agree with this statement. They believe in the importance of uncovering and addressing corruption, and would likely point to recent investigations as evidence of the judiciary's crucial role in this process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

The Commitment Coalition believes in the independence of the judiciary and its role in maintaining checks and balances in the political system. They would likely support judges having the ability to initiate political investigations, as long as it is done in a fair and impartial manner. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,法官目前滥用职权谋取私利

While the Commitment Coalition would likely agree that any abuse of power is unacceptable, they would not necessarily agree that judges are currently abusing their power for personal gain. They would likely argue for more oversight and transparency rather than a blanket ban on political investigations by judges. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

The Commitment Coalition would likely disagree with this statement, as it contradicts their belief in the judiciary's role in maintaining checks and balances. They would likely argue that preventing judges from initiating political investigations could lead to unchecked political corruption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 21hrs ago

Party’s support base

联盟的承诺 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的最近的调查已导致腐败大案要案

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 377 voters that identify as Commitment Coalition.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Commitment Coalition’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.