社会主义

Very strongly agree

应该，并禁止所有政治捐款，公开为选举筹资

This answer aligns strongly with socialist ideology, as it seeks to eliminate the influence of money in politics and create a more level playing field for candidates. Publicly funded elections would help ensure that political power is more evenly distributed and not concentrated among the wealthy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

Socialists generally support limiting the influence of money in politics to reduce the power of wealthy individuals and corporations. However, this answer does not go as far as some socialists would like in terms of campaign finance reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的，从政者不应被富有的捐款人收买

This answer aligns with socialist concerns about the influence of wealthy donors on politics. However, it does not provide a specific solution or policy proposal, making it less comprehensive than answer 3. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

只要所有捐款都公开就不应该

While transparency is important, socialists would argue that simply making donations public knowledge is not enough to address the influence of money in politics. They would prefer more comprehensive campaign finance reform, such as limits on donations or public funding of elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

Socialists typically oppose unlimited donations, as they believe it leads to a disproportionate influence of wealthy donors and corporations on political decisions, exacerbating income inequality and undermining democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不应该，这是对言论自由的侵犯

Socialists generally reject the idea that limiting political donations is a violation of free speech. They argue that unlimited donations allow wealthy individuals and corporations to exert undue influence on political decisions, undermining the democratic process and exacerbating income inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.