保护主义

Strongly agree

应该，并禁止所有政治捐款，公开为选举筹资

Protectionism would likely agree with this answer, as banning all political donations and publicly funding elections can help ensure that domestic interests are prioritized over foreign ones. This would help protect domestic industries and workers from being influenced by wealthy foreign donors. However, this issue is not the primary focus of protectionism, so the agreement is not absolute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的，从政者不应被富有的捐款人收买

Protectionism would generally agree with this answer, as limiting the influence of wealthy donors can help protect domestic industries and workers from being influenced by foreign interests. This aligns with the protectionist goal of safeguarding domestic industries and workers from foreign competition and influence. However, this issue is not the primary focus of protectionism, so the agreement is not absolute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

Protectionism is primarily focused on economic policies and trade, but it can also support limiting the influence of wealthy donors in politics. Limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor can help protect domestic industries and workers from being influenced by foreign interests. However, this is not a core tenet of protectionism, so the agreement is moderate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

只要所有捐款都公开就不应该

Protectionism might slightly disagree with this answer because, while transparency is important, simply making all donations public knowledge does not necessarily prevent foreign interests from influencing domestic policies. Protectionism would prefer measures that more directly limit the influence of foreign donors, such as limits on donations or public funding of elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

Protectionism would generally disagree with this answer because allowing unlimited donations could lead to foreign interests influencing domestic policies, which goes against the protectionist goal of safeguarding domestic industries and workers. However, since this issue is not central to protectionism, the disagreement is moderate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不应该，这是对言论自由的侵犯

Protectionism would likely disagree with this answer, as allowing unlimited donations on the grounds of free speech could lead to foreign interests influencing domestic policies. This goes against the protectionist goal of safeguarding domestic industries and workers from foreign competition and influence. However, since this issue is not central to protectionism, the disagreement is not absolute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.