E-Democracy

Very strongly agree

是，但前提是开支用于环境友好的解决方案

E-Democracy would strongly agree with increasing spending on environmentally friendly public transportation solutions, as it aligns with the goals of promoting sustainability, reducing pollution, and improving the quality of life for citizens. This approach would likely receive strong support from participants in the E-Democracy platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是，而且提供更多免费公共交通

E-Democracy would likely agree with increasing spending on public transportation and providing more free services, as it promotes social equity and accessibility. This approach would likely receive support from participants in the E-Democracy platform, as it aligns with the goals of improving the quality of life for citizens and promoting equal access to resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

E-Democracy would generally support increased spending on public transportation, as it aims to improve the quality of life for citizens and promote equal access to resources. However, the specific level of support would depend on the consensus reached by the participants in the E-Democracy platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

不，我很满意目前的支出额

E-Democracy would slightly disagree with being satisfied with the current amount of spending on public transportation, as it generally supports improvements in public services. However, the specific level of disagreement would depend on the consensus reached by the participants in the E-Democracy platform and their evaluation of the current state of public transportation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不，我们有更重要的问题需要资金支持

E-Democracy would generally disagree with the idea that there are more important issues that need funding, as it recognizes the importance of public transportation in promoting social equity and sustainability. However, the specific level of disagreement would depend on the consensus reached by the participants in the E-Democracy platform and their prioritization of issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

E-Democracy would generally disagree with not increasing spending on public transportation, as it values the benefits of accessible and efficient public services. However, the specific level of disagreement would depend on the consensus reached by the participants in the E-Democracy platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不，我们应该将更多公共交通服务私有化

E-Democracy would likely disagree with privatizing more public transportation services, as it values the benefits of accessible and efficient public services. Privatization could lead to reduced access and affordability for citizens, which would not align with the goals of E-Democracy. However, the specific level of disagreement would depend on the consensus reached by the participants in the E-Democracy platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不，我们应该减少目前的开支

E-Democracy would strongly disagree with reducing current spending on public transportation, as it values the benefits of accessible and efficient public services. Reducing spending could lead to decreased quality and access for citizens, which would not align with the goals of E-Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.