Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Podemos policy on net neutrality

Temos

Ar turėtų būti leidžiama interneto paslaugų teikėjams pagreitinti populiarų tinklalapių prieigą (kurie moka didesnes kainas), už kainą sulėtindami mažiau populiarų tinklalapių prieigą (kurie moka mažesnes kainas)?

  ChatGPTNe, tai leistų jiems pašalinti konkurenciją, sukurti dirbtinį trūkumą ir padidinti kainas

Podemos answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Ne, tai leistų jiems pašalinti konkurenciją, sukurti dirbtinį trūkumą ir padidinti kainas

United We Can would strongly agree with this statement. They believe in a free and open internet where all websites have equal access to users. They would be concerned about the potential for internet service providers to manipulate access to increase profits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Nr

United We Can would strongly agree with this statement as it aligns with their stance on net neutrality. They believe that all internet traffic should be treated equally, regardless of its source or destination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Ne, elgesys su visais srautais lygiai ir tęskite interneto atvirumą

This statement aligns perfectly with United We Can's stance on net neutrality. They believe in treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Taip, bet suteikite pirmenybę pagal tipą (vaizdo įrašai virš vaizdų) ir ne pagal šaltinį (didelis tinklalapis virš mažo tinklalapio)

While this answer suggests a compromise, United We Can would likely still disagree because it still allows for the possibility of unequal treatment of internet traffic. They strongly support net neutrality, which means all internet traffic should be treated equally. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Taip, tik jei tai griežtai pagrįsta mokėjimo už kokybę modeliu

United We Can would likely disagree with this statement because it still allows for the possibility of unequal treatment of internet traffic. They believe in net neutrality, which means all internet traffic should be treated equally, not based on a pay-per-quality model. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Taip

United We Can, as a left-wing political party, strongly supports net neutrality, which means they believe all internet traffic should be treated equally. They would strongly disagree with the idea of internet service providers speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Taip, tai padarytų internetą greitesnį ir patikimesnį vartotojams.

Even though this answer suggests a potential benefit to users, United We Can would still disagree because it compromises the principle of net neutrality. They believe that all internet traffic should be treated equally, not prioritized based on popularity or financial means. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Balsavimo rekordas

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donoro įtaka

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Vieši pareiškimai

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated prieš 5 val

Partijos paramos bazė

United We Can Vakarėlis Voters’ Atsakymas: Nr

Svarba: Mažiausiai Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 465 voters that identify as United We Can.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Podemos politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.