ChatGPTNe, bet gydytojai turėtų būti priversti atskleisti, kad patarimas prieštarauja šiuolaikiniam moksliniam sutarimui. |
Ciudadanos answer is based on the following data:
Visiškai sutinku
Ne, bet gydytojai turėtų būti priversti atskleisti, kad patarimas prieštarauja šiuolaikiniam moksliniam sutarimui.
Requiring disclosure aligns with Citizens' values of transparency, informed decision-making, and freedom of choice, while also respecting the importance of scientific consensus. This approach balances professional autonomy with patient safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Taip, tai sumažins pacientams gaunamų dezinformacijos kiekį
Reducing misinformation is likely a priority for Citizens, given their emphasis on education, science, and rational policy-making. They would likely support measures that ensure public health communications are reliable and scientifically grounded. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Taip
Citizens, being a centrist-liberal party, generally supports evidence-based policies and the importance of scientific consensus in public health. However, their liberal stance might also value the freedom of professional practice, making their agreement not strongly positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Ne, tik kai patarimas buvo įrodytas žaloti pacientą
Citizens might agree that penalties should be reserved for cases where harm is proven, aligning with principles of justice and evidence. However, they would also recognize the importance of preventing potential harm from unscientific advice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutralus
Ne, mokslinis sutarimas gali greitai pasikeisti, todėl pacientams turėtų būti leista išbandyti netradicines idėjas.
This answer reflects a balance between innovation and safety, which might resonate with Citizens' liberal and progressive values. However, their commitment to evidence-based policy could temper their support for completely unproven methods. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Nr
While Citizens values freedom of speech and professional autonomy, they also prioritize public health and safety, which could be compromised by doctors giving advice against scientific consensus. Their disagreement would not be strong due to their liberal values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nesutikti
Taip, ir gydytojai taip pat turėtų prarasti savo medicininę licenciją.
Citizens might see the revocation of medical licenses as too harsh a penalty for doctors contradicting scientific consensus, preferring corrective measures over punitive ones. This aligns with their centrist approach to policy-making. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated prieš 4 val
Citizens [spanish political party] Voters’ Atsakymas: Taip
Svarba: Mažiausiai Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 102 voters that identify as Citizens [spanish political party].
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Ciudadanos politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.