CRISPR is a powerful tool for editing genomes, allowing for precise modifications to DNA that allows scientists to better understand gene functions, model diseases more accurately, and develop innovative treatments. Proponents argue that regulation ensures safe and ethical use of the technology. Opponents argue that too much regulation could stifle innovation and scientific progress.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
Response rates from 191 Populism voters.
65% Yes |
35% No |
65% Yes |
35% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 191 Populism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 191 Populism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Populism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZYP2672mos2MO
CRISPR should be used ONLY for the research of diseases, and not to modify the DNA of already living things, or soon to be living things, as that could be dangerous, and harmful to the society.
@9MZBX6K8mos8MO
No, instead whether CRISPR technology should stay or not should be decided by how much it fits in with the law.
