CRISPR is a powerful tool for editing genomes, allowing for precise modifications to DNA that allows scientists to better understand gene functions, model diseases more accurately, and develop innovative treatments. Proponents argue that regulation ensures safe and ethical use of the technology. Opponents argue that too much regulation could stifle innovation and scientific progress.
@9ZYP2672mos2MO
CRISPR should be used ONLY for the research of diseases, and not to modify the DNA of already living things, or soon to be living things, as that could be dangerous, and harmful to the society.
@9MZBX6K8mos8MO
No, instead whether CRISPR technology should stay or not should be decided by how much it fits in with the law.
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@9TX35KJ4mos4MO
The repairs should CRISPR is how regular human technology in genetic testing as said government feedback admins
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.