Try the political quiz

15 Replies

 @9ZYP267from Iowa  answered…2mos2MO

CRISPR should be used ONLY for the research of diseases, and not to modify the DNA of already living things, or soon to be living things, as that could be dangerous, and harmful to the society.

 @9MZBX6Kanswered…8mos8MO

No, instead whether CRISPR technology should stay or not should be decided by how much it fits in with the law.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Should parents be allowed to use this kind of technology to select specific traits for their unborn children?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Do you believe using science to extend human lifespan is more of an opportunity or a danger?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

How would you feel if someone edited their DNA to increase intelligence—fair game, or unfair advantage?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Could making genetic modifications increase social inequalities, or would it reduce them?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Would you personally use gene editing to eliminate a potential health issue in yourself or your family?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

What responsibility do you think we have to regulate how much technology like this is used in our society?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Can you name a potential positive or negative impact on nature and ecosystems if gene editing were widely applied outside humans?

 @9TX35KJanswered…4mos4MO

The repairs should CRISPR is how regular human technology in genetic testing as said government feedback admins

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

If you could change one genetic trait, what would it be and why?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Do you think altering human genes to eliminate disease crosses an ethical line, or is it just the next step in human evolution?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

How do you feel about the idea of using technology to control future generations' traits or abilities?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...