@ISIDEWITHQuestionsthe Environment8mos ago

Should the EU impose stricter limitations on fishing quotas to preserve marine ecosystems?

Stricter fishing quotas are intended to prevent overfishing and protect marine biodiversity. Supporters see it as critical for environmental conservation. However, opponents, particularly from communities reliant on fishing, argue it could negatively impact livelihoods.

+
Expand
+ Settings

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 1.1k Spain voters.

65%
Yes
35%
No
65%
Yes
35%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.1k Spain voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 1.1k Spain voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Spain voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9MZBX6Kanswered…7mos7MO

Yes, but not for communities who rely on fishing for their livelihoods.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Fishing Rights” news articles, updated frequently.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…9mos9MO

Katchatheevu Island Dispute Stirs Political Tensions Between India and Sri Lanka

The small island of Katchatheevu, nestled in the Palk Strait that separates India and Sri Lanka, has become the epicenter of a growing political dispute between the two neighboring countries. Spanning just about 1.9 square kilometers, this seemingly insignificant piece of land has sparked a significant row, highlighting the complex historical and emotional ties that bind and divide the region. The island, which lies closer to India's Tamil Nadu state but was ceded to Sri Lanka in 1974, has since been a point of contention, particularly among the fishing communities and political circles in Tamil Nadu.The recent flare-up in tensions can be traced back to historical decisions and the emotional weight the island carries for many. In the 1970s, under the leadership of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, India formally recognized Sri Lanka's sovereignty over Katchatheevu through a bilateral agreement. This decision, however, has been met with criticism and regret in retrospect, with some Indian politicians and diplomats questioning the strategic foresight of ceding such a strategically located piece of land.Former Foreign Secretary Harsh Sringla's recent comments slamming the opposition for their stance on the island have reignited the debate, underscoring the island's symbolic significance beyond its geographical size. Sringla's reference to the island as more than just a 'piece of rock' and his critique of historical political decisions reflect the deep-seated emotions and national pride intertwined with the issue.The dispute over Katchatheevu is not just about territorial claims but also involves the livelihoods of fishermen from both countries, who have traditionally accessed the waters around the island. The ongoing tensions have led to frequent confrontations at sea, highlighting the need for a diplomatic resolution that respects the interests and concerns of all parties involved.As the debate over Katchatheevu continues to unfold, it serves as a reminder of the enduring challenges in South Asian geopolitics, where historical legacies and contemporary realities often collide. The resolution of the Katchatheevu dispute will require not only diplomatic finesse but also a sensitive understanding of the historical and emotional dimensions that have shaped the current impasse.