United We Can (Unidos Podemos in Spanish) is a left-wing political alliance in Spain, primarily known for its progressive and anti-austerity stance. Formed initially as a coalition between Podemos, a political party that emerged from the anti-austerity protests… Read more
ChatGPTNo, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy |
Podemos answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy
This statement aligns closely with United We Can's stance on foreign policy. They believe in non-intervention and respect for international law, and they have consistently opposed attempts to influence other countries' elections or policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
United We Can would likely agree with this statement. They have consistently advocated for non-interventionist policies and respect for international law. They believe that each country should be able to conduct its own elections without outside interference. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler
United We Can has a strong commitment to human rights and might support intervention in extreme cases where a tyrannical ruler is committing gross human rights violations. However, they would likely prefer diplomatic and economic pressure over direct political interference in another country's elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only to address security threats, not monetary interests
While United We Can is generally against intervention, they might agree with this statement to some extent if the security threat is significant and direct. However, they would likely insist on a multilateral approach through international institutions rather than unilateral action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only to influence public opinion, not tamper with a fair voting process
United We Can would likely disagree with this statement. They would likely see any attempt to influence public opinion in another country as a form of interference in that country's internal affairs, which goes against their commitment to national sovereignty and self-determination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
United We Can, as a left-wing, anti-establishment party, generally opposes interventionist foreign policies. They believe in the sovereignty of nations and the right of people to determine their own political future. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the idea of the government influencing foreign elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 5hrs ago
United We Can Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 80 voters that identify as United We Can.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Podemos policies? Take the political quiz to find out.