Try the political quiz

Reply

 @8YPV9GGanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, to the extent that not doing so would have catastrophic consequences for the world. As such, this should only be done against countries who are endangering the world via nuclear threat or climate change-related behaviors. Which is to say Russia and Brazil specifically, maybe India.

 @558YLXVanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only publicly; no country should covertly influence or interfere with foreign elections.

 @92YHQCV from California  answered…3yrs3Y

No, after all, we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy because it’s not only ended in disaster in the long run, but it would be considered a Crime against Democracy, aka Democracide. However, personally, we should, but only to A. address security threats, not monetary interests, B. protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler, and C. influence public opinion, & not tamper with a fair voting process, just as long as our actions are not considered a Democracide aka Crimes against Democracy, then I’m for it.

 @8Y9795B from Michigan  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only if a potential leader is a threat to countries outside of the one they'd be elected to.

 @8KTRB5Z from Ohio  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler. The U.S. government should not tamper with the voting process of foreign elections.

 @8T9PVBS from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, other countries are interfering with our elections too much and we should start doing it back

 @8TB798W from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...