Unitarian Candidacy of Workers Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

The CUT would strongly agree with this statement. As a far-left party, they would likely support the idea of publicly funded elections and a ban on political donations as a way to limit the influence of wealth in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

The CUT would strongly agree with this statement. They believe in limiting the influence of wealth in politics and would likely see this as a way to prevent politicians from being 'bought' by wealthy donors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Unitarian Candidacy of Workers (Candidatura Unitaria de Trabajadores, CUT) would likely agree with this statement, as they are a far-left party that often advocates for limits on wealth and power, including in the political sphere. However, they might prefer even stricter regulations, hence the score is not the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

While the CUT might agree with the transparency aspect of this statement, they would likely disagree with the idea of unlimited donations, even if they are public knowledge. They would likely see this as a way for the wealthy to still have undue influence in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The CUT would likely disagree with this statement, as they believe in limiting the influence of wealth in politics. They would likely see unlimited donations as a way for the wealthy to unduly influence politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

The CUT would strongly disagree with this statement. They would likely see this as a way for the wealthy to unduly influence politics, and would not view it as a free speech issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.