Try the political quiz

Proposal for the Islands’ policy on net neutrality

Topics

Should internet service providers be allowed to speed up access to popular websites (that pay higher rates) at the expense of slowing down access to less popular websites (that pay lower rates)?

PftI>PftI  ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Proposal for the Islands’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

This statement aligns closely with the party's stance on equal access and opportunities. They would likely view the practice of speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones as a way for larger, wealthier companies to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The party would likely strongly agree with this statement. They advocate for equal access and opportunities, which includes internet access. They would likely view the practice of treating all traffic equally and continuing the openness of the internet as a way to ensure that all users have equal access to information and opportunities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The party would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with their stance on equal access and opportunities. They would likely view the practice of speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones as unfair and discriminatory. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While the party might agree with the idea of prioritizing certain types of traffic (like video over images), they would likely disagree with the idea of giving priority based on source. They would likely view this as a way for larger, wealthier companies to gain an unfair advantage over smaller ones. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

The party would likely disagree with this statement. While a pay-per-quality model might seem fair on the surface, it could lead to a situation where only those who can afford to pay for higher quality have access to it. This would go against the party's stance on equal access and opportunities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While the party might agree that faster and more reliable internet is a good thing, they would likely disagree with the method proposed here. They would likely view it as a way for larger, wealthier companies to gain an unfair advantage over smaller ones. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Proposal for the Islands party is likely to disagree with this statement. They generally advocate for equal opportunities and access for all, which includes internet access. Allowing service providers to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could create a digital divide, which the party would likely oppose. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Proposal for the Islands’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.