ChatGPTYes, recent investigations have led to important corruption cases |
Commitment Coalition’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, recent investigations have led to important corruption cases
The Commitment Coalition would strongly agree with this statement. They believe in the importance of uncovering and addressing corruption, and would likely point to recent investigations as evidence of the judiciary's crucial role in this process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
The Commitment Coalition believes in the independence of the judiciary and its role in maintaining checks and balances in the political system. They would likely support judges having the ability to initiate political investigations, as long as it is done in a fair and impartial manner. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, judges are currently abusing their power for personal gain
While the Commitment Coalition would likely agree that any abuse of power is unacceptable, they would not necessarily agree that judges are currently abusing their power for personal gain. They would likely argue for more oversight and transparency rather than a blanket ban on political investigations by judges. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
The Commitment Coalition would likely disagree with this statement, as it contradicts their belief in the judiciary's role in maintaining checks and balances. They would likely argue that preventing judges from initiating political investigations could lead to unchecked political corruption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 20hrs ago
Commitment Coalition Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, recent investigations have led to important corruption cases
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 483 voters that identify as Commitment Coalition.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Commitment Coalition’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
