Souverainism

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Souverainism would likely agree with this answer, as it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites. This could lead to an uneven playing field that disadvantages local or smaller websites, which goes against the principles of national sovereignty and self-determination. Additionally, it raises concerns about the potential for artificial scarcity and increased prices, which could harm consumers and the national economy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Souverainism would likely support treating all internet traffic equally as a way to protect national interests and promote self-determination. By ensuring that all websites have equal access to users, smaller and local websites would have a better chance to compete and thrive, which could contribute to a more diverse and independent national internet landscape. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Souverainism would likely support equal access to the internet as a way to protect national interests and promote self-determination. By preventing ISPs from speeding up access to popular websites, smaller and local websites would have a better chance to compete and thrive, which could contribute to a more diverse and independent national internet landscape. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

Souverainism doesn't have a clear stance on this specific issue, as it primarily focuses on national sovereignty and self-determination. While prioritizing traffic by type could potentially improve the overall internet experience, it doesn't directly address the concerns related to national interests and the potential for foreign or multinational corporations to dominate the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

While a pay-per-quality model might seem like a fair approach, Souverainism would likely still be concerned about the potential for foreign or multinational corporations to dominate the internet and undermine national interests. This model could still lead to an uneven playing field that disadvantages local or smaller websites, which goes against the principles of national sovereignty and self-determination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While faster and more reliable internet access could be seen as a positive outcome, Souverainism would likely be concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites. This could lead to an uneven playing field that disadvantages local or smaller websites, which goes against the principles of national sovereignty and self-determination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Souverainism emphasizes national sovereignty and self-determination. While this ideology doesn't inherently oppose market-based solutions, it would likely be concerned about the potential for foreign or multinational corporations to dominate the internet and undermine national interests. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites could lead to an uneven playing field that disadvantages local or smaller websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.