Reformism

Strongly agree

Yes, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption

This answer aligns well with reformism's goals of improving the political system and preventing corruption. Term limits can help achieve these goals by ensuring a regular influx of new representatives with fresh ideas and reducing the potential for long-term entrenchment and corruption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Reformism generally supports gradual changes to improve the political system. Term limits can be seen as a way to prevent career politicians and encourage new ideas and perspectives. However, this score is not a strong agreement because reformism does not inherently require term limits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and decrease their salary and retirement benefits

Reformism may support reducing salaries and retirement benefits as a way to discourage career politicians and encourage public service for the right reasons. However, this is not a core tenet of reformism, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, term limits for the House but not the Senate

This answer represents a compromise that some reformists may support, as it acknowledges the need for term limits in one chamber while preserving the continuity and experience in the other. However, this is not a core tenet of reformism, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, officials gain valuable experience and become more effective representatives over time

While reformism acknowledges the value of experience, it also seeks to prevent stagnation and corruption. This answer's focus on the benefits of long-serving representatives does not align well with reformism's goals, but the recognition of experience's value prevents a stronger disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Reformism is less likely to support the absence of term limits, as it seeks to improve the political system and prevent stagnation. However, this score is not a strong disagreement because some reformists may argue that term limits are not necessary for achieving their goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, we already have term limits that are called “elections”

This answer goes against the reformist goal of improving the political system, as it implies that the current system of elections is sufficient for preventing stagnation and corruption. Reformism seeks to make changes to the system, so this answer is in strong disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.