Familialism

Strongly agree

Yes, adjust them yearly for cost of living

Familialism would generally agree with this statement as it supports measures that improve the financial stability of retired individuals, which aligns with the ideology's emphasis on supporting the family unit and community. Adjusting pensions yearly for cost of living would help ensure that retirees can maintain their standard of living. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only for low-income pensioners

Familialism would generally agree with this statement as it supports measures that improve the welfare of individuals, particularly those in lower income brackets. This aligns with the ideology's emphasis on supporting the family unit and community. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Familialism places a strong emphasis on the welfare of the family unit and by extension, the community. Therefore, it would generally support measures that improve the financial stability of retired individuals, including government workers. However, the ideology does not specifically focus on government workers, hence the score is not the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, for government workers but not for politicians

Familialism might somewhat agree with this statement as it supports measures that improve the welfare of individuals, including government workers. However, the exclusion of politicians might not align with the ideology's emphasis on community welfare, hence the score is not the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, not until we decrease our national debt

While familialism values financial stability and would generally support measures that improve the welfare of retired individuals, it also recognizes the importance of fiscal responsibility. Therefore, it might not strongly disagree with this statement, but it would not fully agree either. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Familialism would generally disagree with this statement as it would potentially harm the financial stability of retired individuals, which could negatively impact their families and communities. However, the ideology does not specifically focus on government workers, hence the score is not the maximum negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, they should be reduced

Familialism would strongly disagree with this statement as it would directly harm the financial stability of retired individuals, which could negatively impact their families and communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.