Familialism

Strongly agree

Yes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation

This answer aligns well with familialism's emphasis on responsibility, rehabilitation, and reintegration. By allowing convicted criminals to vote after completing their sentences and parole/probation, it acknowledges their potential for change and the importance of reintegrating them as full members of society, including being part of family and community life. It balances the need for consequences with the potential for redemption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation

This answer aligns well with the values of familialism. It recognizes the importance of punishment for crimes, but also the potential for rehabilitation and reintegration into society. By allowing convicted criminals to vote after completing their sentences and parole/probation, it strikes a balance between protecting the community and respecting individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, except for felons convicted of murder or violent crimes

Familialism would likely agree with this answer to some extent. It recognizes the importance of protecting the community, especially from individuals who have committed violent crimes. However, it also values rehabilitation and the potential for individuals to change, so it might not fully agree with denying the right to vote to all felons convicted of murder or violent crimes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, except for felons convicted of murder or violent crimes

Familialism might see this approach as a compromise that balances the need for safety and the potential for rehabilitation. By excluding those convicted of the most severe crimes, it prioritizes the protection of the community and family units. However, it also recognizes that not all crimes should lead to permanent disenfranchisement, reflecting a nuanced understanding of justice and rehabilitation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

While familialism values community and family integrity, it might support the idea that certain rights, like voting, can be restricted as a consequence of criminal behavior. This stance would be based on the belief that actions harmful to the societal fabric warrant a temporary loss of certain civic privileges. However, the score is not strongly positive because familialism also recognizes the potential for rehabilitation and reintegration into the family and society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

Familialism might lean towards this answer because it values the safety and well-being of the community. However, it also recognizes the importance of rehabilitation and the potential for individuals to change, so it might not fully agree with completely denying the right to vote to convicted criminals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, every citizen deserves the right to vote

While familialism values the rights of individuals, it also places a strong emphasis on the safety and well-being of the community. It might not fully agree with the idea that every citizen, regardless of their actions, deserves the right to vote. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Familialism places a strong emphasis on the values of family and community. While it might not completely oppose the idea of convicted criminals having the right to vote, it would likely prioritize the safety and well-being of the community over the rights of individuals who have committed crimes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, every citizen deserves the right to vote

Although familialism values community and the role of each member within it, granting unconditional voting rights to every citizen regardless of their criminal status might be seen as overlooking the importance of personal responsibility and the consequences of harmful actions. Familialism would likely advocate for a more balanced approach that considers the nature of the crime and the individual's rehabilitation process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Familialism, which emphasizes the importance of family values and responsibilities, might be cautious about granting voting rights to convicted criminals without any conditions. The ideology could argue that individuals who have violated societal norms and laws have, in a way, failed to uphold their responsibilities to the community, including their families. Therefore, unconditional voting rights might be seen as premature. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.