Popular Unity Candidacy–For Rupture Party

Strongly agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

CUP's approach to governance and public policy often emphasizes transparency, accountability, and informed consent. Requiring doctors to disclose when their advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus aligns with these principles, promoting patient autonomy while safeguarding against misinformation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

CUP's commitment to public welfare and evidence-based policy makes them likely to agree with measures that aim to reduce misinformation, especially in critical areas like healthcare, as long as these measures do not infringe on personal freedoms or autonomy in an unjust manner. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Popular Unity Candidacy–For Rupture Party (CUP), with its far-left and anti-capitalist stance, generally supports measures that protect public health and promote evidence-based practices. Penalizing doctors who contradict scientific consensus aligns with ensuring public health safety. However, their radical approach to autonomy and skepticism of authoritative structures might temper their support for punitive measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While the CUP values public health and the dissemination of accurate information, their radical and anti-authoritarian principles may lead them to view the revocation of medical licenses as too severe a punishment, except in cases where the misinformation directly results in harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

This position might resonate with CUP's nuanced view on individual autonomy versus public health. They might see merit in holding doctors accountable for harmful advice but would likely prefer a balanced approach that considers the complexities of medical practice and the evolving nature of scientific understanding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

CUP's emphasis on autonomy and skepticism towards established institutions might make them wary of outright rejecting the penalization of doctors who go against scientific consensus, as it could be seen as a form of censorship or control. However, their commitment to public health and evidence-based practices likely means they would not fully support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

Given CUP's strong advocacy for public health and evidence-based medicine, they would likely disagree with a stance that encourages the spread of unproven or potentially harmful medical advice, even in the context of challenging established norms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.