Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
经济 › 同工同酬
Personal answer不,还有太多其它可变因素了,比如教育、经验和任期都能决定公平的工资待遇 |
医保 › 精神健康
Personal answer不应该,而是应该鼓励私营公司来解决这一问题 |
社会 › 堕胎
Personal answerPro-life, and better access to birth control and sex education will help reduce the number of abortiona |
社会 › 同性恋婚姻
Personal answer不要让政府参与到婚姻里面,而是要将它当做一个宗教的决定 |
社会 › 工作场所性别多元化
Personal answer不,政府不应该要求私人企业多样性。 |
社会 › Gender Transition
Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
Personal answerOnly Incumbents or candidates that already hold government positions |
科学 › 强制接种疫苗
Personal answer无论如何,这应该是州一级政府的决定。 |
经济 › 政府支出
Personal answer是,而且应该削减不符宪法规定的联邦政府机构 |
经济 › Four-day Workweek
Personal answerThat should be decided by the states or company |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
Personal answerNo, athletes should compete based on the biological sex that is listed on their birth certificate |
社会 › Hate Speech
Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
经济 › 社会福利
Personal answer增加限制,改革制度,使福利补充而不是替代工作收入 |
经济 › 国内工作
Personal answer不,政府不应该干涉自由市场 |
经济 › 工会
Personal answer理论上是有帮助的,但最近腐败现象太多,应该限制其权力 |
经济 › 经济刺激
Personal answer是的,但是使用对所有公民减税的形式。 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 任期限制
Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 政府养老金
Personal answer应该,但针对政府工作人员,而不是政客 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
Personal answer不 |
环境 › Animal Testing
Personal answer是的 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
外交政策 › 对朝鲜的军事打击
Personal answer不 |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
Personal answerThey have the right to ask as the customer has a right not to disclose medical information |
移民 › 公民考试
Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Ukraine and Nato
Personal answerThat's completely up to Ukraine |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › 竞选经费
Personal answerYes, but make candidates announce which corporations donate to them on their commercials |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
Personal answer不 |
经济 › 福利毒品测试
Personal answerYes, including all elected and appointed government officials |
移民 › 双重国籍
Personal answer是的 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
Personal answer不 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
Personal answerRelease all prisoners who are in incarcerated for victimless crimes |
经济 › 关税
Personal answer不,全球自由贸易体系对我们的企业和消费者来说更好 |
经济 › State Ownership
Personal answerNo, the government should not be involved in corporate bailouts |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
Personal answer是的 |
医保 › World Health Organization
Personal answer不 |
医保 › 安全港
Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
Personal answer不 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
Personal answerYes, as long as the local environment is not compromised |
环境 › 水力压裂法
Personal answerYes, as long as it doesn't damage the environment or water supplies |
经济 › Cryptocurrency
Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Decentralized Finance
Personal answerYes, but only if it’s truly decentralized and cannot be manipulated by any person, group, or government agency |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 19 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.