Electric and hybrid vehicles use electricity and a combination of electricity and fuel, respectively, to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and decrease emissions. Proponents argue that it significantly cuts pollution and advances the transition to renewable energy sources. Opponents argue that it increases vehicle costs, limits consumer choice, and may strain the electric grid.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 175 Secularism voters.
36% 是的 |
64% 不 |
33% 是的 |
62% 不 |
3% Yes, but only if it includes subsidies for low-income citizens to afford these vehicles |
1% No, electric vehicle parts can be just as dangerous to the environment as emissions |
0% Yes, and require all emission based machinery to transition to clean energy |
1% No, incentivize consumers and manufacturers instead of forcing them |
0% No, not until we find an eco-friendly and humane way to acquire the materials |
|
0% No, the government has no right to interfere in consumer choices or the free market |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 175 Secularism voters.
正在载入数据......
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 175 Secularism voters.
正在载入数据......
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Secularism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
