Vox Party

Very strongly agree

不，但是我们应该禁止从“高危”国家移民。

This answer aligns well with Vox's stance on immigration. They have called for stricter controls on immigration from countries they consider to be 'high risk' due to terrorism or cultural differences. For example, in their 2019 electoral program, they proposed to deport illegal immigrants and restrict immigration from countries with a high terrorism risk. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

Vox has a strong anti-immigration stance and has expressed concerns about the potential security risks posed by Muslim immigrants. However, they have not explicitly called for a complete ban on Muslim immigration, but rather stricter controls and limitations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该，直到恐怖袭击减少

Vox might partially agree with this answer, as they have expressed concerns about terrorism and the need for improved security measures. However, their focus is more on stricter immigration controls and limitations rather than a temporary ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的，禁止所有移民，直到政府改善其筛选过程

While Vox supports stricter immigration controls and improved screening processes, they have not explicitly called for a complete ban on all immigration. Their focus is more on limiting immigration from specific 'high risk' countries and deporting illegal immigrants. However, they might partially agree with the sentiment behind this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

Vox is generally against unrestricted immigration, especially from Muslim-majority countries, due to concerns about security and cultural integration. They would likely disagree with this answer as it does not address their concerns about potential security risks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不，根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的

Vox would strongly disagree with this answer, as they have consistently advocated for stricter immigration controls, particularly from Muslim-majority countries. They believe that cultural differences and security concerns justify their stance, even if it may be seen as discriminatory by some. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.