United We Can Party

Very strongly agree

应该，并禁止所有政治捐款，公开为选举筹资

United We Can has a strong stance on limiting the influence of money in politics and has advocated for public funding of elections. They believe that this would help to prevent corruption and ensure equal representation for all candidates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

是的，从政者不应被富有的捐款人收买

United We Can strongly agrees with this statement. They have consistently advocated for measures to prevent politicians from being influenced by wealthy donors, believing that this can lead to corruption and unequal representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

United We Can, as a left-wing political party, generally supports measures to limit the influence of money in politics. They believe that limiting donations can help prevent corruption and ensure a level playing field for all candidates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

只要所有捐款都公开就不应该

While United We Can supports transparency in political donations, they also believe in limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor. Therefore, they would somewhat agree with this statement, but would prefer stricter limits on donations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

United We Can is likely to disagree with this statement as they have consistently advocated for limiting the influence of money in politics. They believe that unlimited donations can lead to corruption and unequal representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不应该，这是对言论自由的侵犯

United We Can would strongly disagree with this statement. They do not see donation limits as a violation of free speech, but rather as a necessary measure to prevent corruption and ensure equal representation in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.