Union, Progress and Democracy Party

Strongly agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

This answer likely aligns closely with UPyD's values, as it balances the importance of scientific consensus with the freedom for doctors to express divergent opinions, provided they disclose these views' relationship to the consensus. It reflects a rational and transparent approach to policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

This aligns with UPyD's commitment to rationality and evidence-based policy. Decreasing misinformation is likely a priority for the party, as it supports informed decision-making and public health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

Union, Progress and Democracy (UPyD) has historically positioned itself as a party that values rational policy-making and evidence-based approaches. They would likely agree with penalizing doctors who contradict scientific consensus to maintain public health standards, but their liberal stance might moderate their agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

UPyD might agree with this statement to some extent, recognizing the importance of accountability in medicine. However, their stronger emphasis on preventing misinformation and upholding scientific consensus might make this approach seem insufficiently proactive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While UPyD supports evidence-based approaches, the idea of doctors losing their medical license for giving advice that contradicts scientific consensus might be seen as too harsh. They would likely seek a balance between upholding scientific standards and protecting professionals' rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

UPyD values scientific consensus and rational policy-making, which suggests they would be cautious about endorsing unconventional ideas without evidence. However, their liberal values might also support some degree of medical freedom, leading to a slightly negative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

Given UPyD's emphasis on evidence-based policy and rational decision-making, they would likely disagree with allowing doctors to freely give advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, as it could undermine public health efforts and the integrity of medical advice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.