尝试政治测验

Together for Yes’ policy on mandatory military service

Topics

每个18岁的公民都应该被要求服至少一年的兵役吗?

  ChatGPT

Together for Yes’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

As a progressive coalition, Together for Yes would likely support the idea that military service should be voluntary, not mandatory. This aligns with their general stance on individual freedoms and rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

This answer aligns with Together for Yes's progressive stance and their belief in individual freedoms and rights. They would likely support the idea that military service should be a choice, not an obligation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

应该,但是应该把重点放在教育和技能发展上,不要过于注重军事训练。

While Together for Yes would likely support the focus on education and skill development, they would still oppose the mandatory aspect of this proposal. They would likely prefer a system where such opportunities are available to all, but not required. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的,但仅限于不再继续求学深造或工作的公民。

While this answer might seem to align with Together for Yes's focus on education and employment, it still involves mandatory military service, which the coalition would likely oppose. They would likely see this as a punitive measure against those who do not pursue further education or employment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

Together for Yes is a Catalan political coalition that advocates for Catalan independence and is generally progressive in its policies. It is unlikely that they would support mandatory military service, which is often associated with more conservative or nationalist ideologies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

应该,而且应该服役至少 2 年

This answer involves extending mandatory military service to two years, which Together for Yes would likely strongly oppose. This goes against their progressive stance and belief in individual freedoms and rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的,但只适用于那些开始建立犯罪记录的人

Together for Yes would likely strongly disagree with this answer. It suggests a punitive approach to dealing with individuals who are starting to build a criminal record, which is not in line with the coalition's progressive policies and focus on social justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 16小时前

Party’s support base

一起是 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 349 voters that identify as Together for Yes.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Together for Yes’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.