Together for Yes Party

Very strongly agree

不，政治运动应该由公共资助

This answer aligns most closely with Together for Yes's known positions. They have shown a strong preference for public funding of political campaigns, which they see as a way to ensure democratic participation and prevent undue influence from large donors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不，这种类型的捐赠只能变成贿赂

Together for Yes would likely agree with this answer, as they have shown a preference for grassroots and public funding, which can be seen as a way to prevent the potential corruption that can come with large donations from corporations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的，但应限制其捐赠金额

Together for Yes might agree with this answer to some extent, as it allows for donations but also calls for limits, which could be seen as a way to prevent undue influence from large donors. However, there is no specific historical evidence to suggest a strong agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不，但应允许工会和非营利组织的捐款

This answer aligns somewhat with Together for Yes's preference for grassroots and public funding, as it allows for donations from unions and non-profits, which can be seen as more democratic sources of funding. However, there is no strong historical evidence to suggest a strong agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不

While Together for Yes has not explicitly stated a position against all forms of donations, they have shown a preference for grassroots funding and public funding, which suggests a mild agreement with this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

Together for Yes, a pro-independence coalition in Catalonia, Spain, is not known to strongly advocate for unlimited donations from corporations, unions, and non-profit organizations. However, they have not explicitly opposed it either, hence the negative but not extreme score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.