Together for Yes (Junts pel Sí in Catalan) was a political coalition in Catalonia, Spain, formed to contest the 2015 Catalan parliamentary election. It was not a political party in the traditional sense but rather a coalition of various parties and… Read more
ChatGPT应该,每年根据生活费进行调整 |
Together for Yes’ answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
应该,每年根据生活费进行调整
Together for Yes would likely strongly agree with adjusting pension payments yearly for cost of living, as this aligns with their support for social welfare and ensuring retirees can maintain their standard of living. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
应该,但仅针对低收入养老金领取者
Together for Yes would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with their support for social welfare and targeted assistance for those most in need. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
是的
Together for Yes, a Catalan pro-independence coalition, generally supports social welfare policies, including increased pensions. However, they might not fully agree without qualifications, such as the need for fiscal responsibility or targeted increases for those most in need. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
应该,但针对政府工作人员,而不是政客
Together for Yes might agree with this statement to some extent, as it suggests targeted increases for government workers, but they might not fully agree with excluding politicians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
在我们削减国债之前,不应该
While Together for Yes might agree with the need for fiscal responsibility, they would likely disagree with the idea of not increasing pensions until the national debt is decreased, as this could negatively impact retirees. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不
As a party that supports social welfare, Together for Yes would likely disagree with the idea of not increasing pension payments for retired government workers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
不应该增加,而应减少养老金支付
Together for Yes would strongly disagree with reducing pension payments, as this goes against their support for social welfare and could negatively impact retirees. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Together for Yes’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.