Popular Unity Candidacy–For Rupture Party

Very strongly agree

应该，并禁止所有政治捐款，公开为选举筹资

The CUP would strongly agree with this statement. They believe in the public funding of elections to ensure fairness and prevent corruption. They have consistently advocated for measures that limit the influence of money in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

是的，从政者不应被富有的捐款人收买

The CUP would strongly agree with this statement. They believe that politicians should not be influenced by wealthy donors and have consistently advocated for measures to limit the influence of money in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

The Popular Unity Candidacy–For Rupture (CUP) is a left-wing political party that advocates for social justice and equality. They would likely agree with limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor to prevent undue influence and ensure a level playing field.

Slightly agree

只要所有捐款都公开就不应该

While the CUP would agree with the transparency aspect of this statement, they would likely disagree with the idea of unlimited donations, even if they are public knowledge. Therefore, they would somewhat agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

Given their stance on social justice and equality, the CUP would likely disagree with this statement. They would likely argue that unlimited donations could lead to corruption and a disproportionate influence of wealthy individuals on politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不应该，这是对言论自由的侵犯

The CUP would strongly disagree with this statement. They do not view limiting political donations as a violation of free speech, but rather as a necessary measure to prevent corruption and ensure fairness in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.