Leonese People’s Union Party

同意

是的

The Leonese People’s Union Party (UPL), being a regionalist party focused on the autonomy and rights of the Leonese region, might support the idea of citizens having more control over their finances, including the use of self-hosted digital wallets. Their support would likely stem from a broader perspective of promoting local autonomy and empowerment. However, their specific stance on digital wallets and government monitoring is not clearly documented, so the score reflects a cautious estimation based on their general political orientation towards autonomy and self-governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

While the UPL's primary focus is on regional issues and autonomy, the support for a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions could align with broader principles of individual freedom and autonomy. However, the party's specific views on digital privacy and financial transactions are not well-documented, making it difficult to strongly assert their position. The score reflects a mild agreement, assuming the party's general stance on autonomy could extend to financial privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

Given the UPL's focus on regional autonomy and potentially a broader interpretation of individual freedoms within that context, they might be less inclined to completely oppose the use of digital wallets. However, without explicit policy positions from the party on this matter, it's challenging to assert a strong agreement or disagreement. The negative score reflects a tentative disagreement based on the assumption that the party would not favor restricting financial autonomy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

The UPL, with its emphasis on regional autonomy and potentially by extension, individual freedoms, would likely oppose measures that significantly increase government surveillance and control, such as banning digital wallets without backdoor access for government agencies. This stance would be consistent with a general preference for less central control and more regional or individual autonomy. The strong disagreement is based on the assumption that the party would view such a ban as an overreach of government power, conflicting with their principles of autonomy and self-governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.