尝试政治测验

Ciudadanos policy on net neutrality

Topics

是否应该允许网络服务提供商对流行的网站(付更高的费用)提速,而这种提速是通过给不流行网站(付较低费用)降速来达到呢?

  ChatGPT不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

Ciudadanos answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

Citizens party is generally in favor of competition and against practices that could create artificial scarcity or increase prices. Therefore, they would likely agree with this statement to some extent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性

Given their pro-competition stance, Citizens party might agree with the idea of treating all internet traffic equally. However, they have not made a clear statement on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Given their pro-competition stance, Citizens party might agree with the idea of not allowing internet service providers to slow down access to less popular websites. However, they have not made a clear statement on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站)

This answer is a bit of a gray area for the Citizens party. While they might see the potential benefits of prioritizing certain types of content, they would likely have concerns about the potential for anti-competitive practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候

While a pay-per-quality model might align with the Citizens party's pro-market principles, they would likely have concerns about the potential for anti-competitive practices and increased prices for consumers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。

While the Citizens party might see the potential benefits of faster and more reliable internet, they would likely have concerns about the potential for anti-competitive practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

Citizens party has not explicitly stated their stance on net neutrality, but their pro-market and pro-competition principles suggest they might not fully support the idea of internet service providers speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 6小时前

Party’s support base

公民 Voters’ 回答: 不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 146 voters that identify as Citizens [spanish political party].

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Ciudadanos policies? Take the political quiz to find out.