尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  科学

Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals’ policy on nuclear energy

Topics

您是否支持使用核能?

  ChatGPT

Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

PACMA would likely strongly agree with this statement as they advocate for environmental protection and animal rights. The use of nuclear energy can pose risks to both the environment and animals, which aligns with their stance against it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不,我们应该投资在更清洁的替代能源上,比如风能、水力发电、钍和地热

PACMA would likely strongly agree with this statement. The party advocates for environmental protection and animal rights, and would likely support the use of cleaner, renewable energy alternatives that pose less risk to the environment and animals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,暂时性的,同时我们增加投资到更清洁的可再生能源

While PACMA would likely support increasing investment into cleaner renewable alternatives, they would likely still disagree with the temporary use of nuclear energy due to the potential environmental risks and harm to animals. However, the score is not as negative as other nuclear energy options due to the mention of transitioning to cleaner alternatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

The Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals (PACMA) is a political party in Spain that advocates for animal rights, environmental protection, and social justice. They would likely strongly disagree with the use of nuclear energy due to the potential environmental risks and harm to animals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的,但是需要政府补助

PACMA would likely strongly disagree with this statement. The party's stance on environmental protection and animal rights would likely lead them to oppose any form of nuclear energy, regardless of whether it is publicly subsidized or not. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的,并且使这一工业国有化

Nationalizing the industry would not change the fact that nuclear energy can pose risks to the environment and animals. Therefore, PACMA would likely strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的,只要没有政府补贴

Even without public subsidy, the use of nuclear energy can still pose environmental risks and potential harm to animals, which goes against PACMA's principles. Therefore, they would likely strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 17hrs前

Party’s support base

Animalist党反对虐待动物 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 962 voters that identify as Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.