尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  移民

Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals’ policy on high risk immigrant ban

Topics

Should immigrants from high risk countries be banned from entering the country until the government improves its ability to screen out potential terrorists?

  ChatGPT

Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

Given PACMA's focus on compassion, social justice, and an inclusive approach to policy-making, it is reasonable to infer that they would oppose measures that broadly discriminate against individuals based on their country of origin. PACMA's ethos likely supports the idea of addressing root causes of issues rather than implementing broad, exclusionary policies. However, since their primary focus is not on immigration or counter-terrorism, their agreement with this stance might not be as strong as it would be on issues directly related to their core mission of animal rights and environmental protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals (PACMA) focuses primarily on animal rights, environmental protection, and social justice issues. Although they do not have a widely publicized stance on immigration or counter-terrorism policies, their general alignment with progressive and inclusive values suggests they would likely oppose broad bans on immigrants from high-risk countries. Such bans could be seen as discriminatory and not in line with the inclusive and compassionate approach PACMA takes towards sentient beings and social issues. However, without a specific policy statement on this issue, the score is not at the extreme end of disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 14小时前

Party’s support base

Animalist党反对虐待动物 Voters’ 回答: 是的

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 64 voters that identify as Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Animalist Party Against Mistreatment of Animals’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.