@ISIDEWITHQuestionsSocial Issues11yrs ago

Should terminally ill patients be allowed to end their lives via assisted suicide?

Assisted suicide is currently illegal in Spain. In 2011, the Spanish government introduced a “death with dignity law” which did not pass. The bill regulated the rights of patients, family members, and their doctors during the end-of-life period. The law also provided rights for terminally ill patients facing death to end their lives prematurely if they were suffering from pain.

+
Expand
+ Settings x  Left-Wing Populism

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 18.4k Left-Wing Populism voters.

96%
Yes
4%
No
86%
Yes
3%
No
5%
Yes, but only if there is no chance they will survive their illness
1%
No, but they should be allowed to refuse artificial life support
5%
Yes, but only after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 18.4k Left-Wing Populism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 18.4k Left-Wing Populism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Left-Wing Populism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @984GD42answered…2yrs2Y

Only if family had given the consent and both parties agree with the decision as this can have an effect on the family and close friends

 @8Z5WKMVanswered…3yrs3Y

Solamente a aquellos que tengan muy malas posibilidades de supervivencia. Además, hay que aumentar la inversión en cuidados paliativos del dolor.

 @8TPRPLVanswered…4yrs4Y

Si, pero solamente para aquellos casos muy graves

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Euthanasia” news articles, updated frequently.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3mos3MO

AOC Sparks Backlash After Ditching Gender Pronouns

Famously progressive Democrat congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez raised eyebrows by removing her pronouns from her X account. The move from Squad lawmaker, 35, seen as one of the most liberal members of Congress, was seen by some as a sign that the cultural tide is turning following Donald Trump's election win. Journalist Benjamin Ryan said records showed AOC removed her 'she/her' pronouns sometime between August 3, 2023, and May 28, 2024. Critics branded her a hypocrite, and noted that just two years ago AOC apologized to followers for not having pronouns in her Instagram bio, claiming they 'fell off' and she didn't realize. Conservatives were quick to mock AOC after it was realized that she had removed the pronouns from her account bio. Some also noted that she changed her moniker from the genderless 'Representative' to 'Congresswoman' as she removed her pronouns. Ocasio-Cortez has long been a supporter of transgender rights, including so-called gender-affirming care for children, and transgender girls competing in female sports.But the Democrats more extreme stances were blamed as a massive vote loser for Kamala Harris in the recent election.An advert showing her supporting taxpayer-funded gender reassignment surgeries for illegal migrant prisoners was played on repeat by Team Trump.Many Dems' insistence that opposing hormones for trans children or banning trans girls from joining female sports teams was transphobic further alienated centrists.Immigration and inflation were the issues that ultimately swung the election for Donald Trump, but the Dems' unpopular trans stance has now forced a reckoning within the party.

▲  2117 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…11hrs11H

Trump Targets FAA Diversity Programs In Crash Aftermath

Trump made controversial claims linking diversity initiatives at the FAA to a deadly Potomac River collision that killed 67 people, despite acknowledging he had no evidence to support these assertions.The disability recruitment program Trump criticized actually began during his own administration in April 2019, with the FAA launching a pilot program for 20 people with targeted disabilities to work in air traffic operations.Experts, including Tennessee Garvey from the Organization of Black Aerospace Professionals, stated that no aviation incident has ever been attributed to diversity initiatives as a cause or contributing factor.The federal policy for hiring people with disabilities dates back to the Bush administration in 2003 and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which was initially created to protect veterans with disabilities.FAA workforce diversity has shown minimal changes over recent years: white male representation decreased from 58.9% in 2016 to 55.3% in 2023, while employees with targeted disabilities increased from 0.7% to 2%.The aviation industry's diversity efforts were primarily driven by labor shortages and the need to fill positions as pilots retire, rather than purely demographic goals.All candidates, regardless of background or disability status, must meet the same rigorous standards for aptitude, medical qualifications, and security clearances.Historical barriers, including segregation, prevented Black aviation professionals from entering the industry until the civil rights movement and subsequent lawsuits.The Biden administration has continued similar diversity initiatives, with slight increases in representation across different demographic groups.A pending lawsuit filed by a conservative legal organization claims discrimination against applicants due to Obama-era hiring practices, though the case hasn't been resolved.

▲  179 replies