Militarization of police refers to the use of military equipment and tactics by law enforcement officers. This includes the use of armored vehicles, assault rifles, flashbang grenades, sniper rifles, and SWAT teams. Proponents argue that this equipment increases officers’ safety and enables them to better protect the public and other first responders. Opponents argue that police forces which received military equipment were more likely to have violent encounters with the public.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 2.1k Autonomism voters.
68% Yes |
32% No |
39% Yes |
26% No |
15% Yes, but only in response to extreme situations |
6% No, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
13% Yes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment |
0% No, and abolish the police |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.1k Autonomism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 2.1k Autonomism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Autonomism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@8TCFGNV3yrs3Y
Only the Army, but Replace the police with a state run police for the people
@9CT5F481yr1Y
Instead of only having the police, having the military also
@9CKC9L71yr1Y
I say yes because in Florida anyone can carry I gun. That’s why I’m moving to Spain.
@99RNSMM2yrs2Y
Yes, but only in response to extreme situations +Yes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment
